BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID: 1
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-TIMEZONE: America/Los_Angeles
DTSTAMP: 20260531T131755
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID: info@vconferenceonline.com
SUMMARY:Learning Papers I: Habits, Extinction, and Recovery
PRIORITY:0
CATEGORIES:SESSION
CLASS:PUBLIC
DTSTART:20200617T140000
DTEND:20200617T152000
URL: https://event.vconferenceonline.com
DESCRIPTION:<span style="font-size:14px;">CHAIR: ERIC THRAILKILL<br />
<br />
<strong> 2:00pm - 2:15pm<br />
GOAL-DIRECTED AND HABITUAL BEHAVIOR CHAINS IN RATS AND HUMANS<br />
</strong>ERIC THRAILKILL, CATHERINE THORPE, MARK BOUTON (UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT)<br />
Behavior chains are sequences of linked responses required to earn a reinforcer. Here we show in rats that R1 is sensitive to the value of R2 (a goal-directed action) and becomes insensitive (a habit) after extended training. We then show analogous findings with a novel computer task in human participants. The results implicate common associative mechanisms in instrumental learning across rats and humans and inform our understanding of how habits are made and broken.<br />
<br />
<strong> 2:20pm - 2:35pm<br />
EXTINCTION, BUT NOT SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY, OF CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCES<br />
</strong>ANDREW DELAMATER (BROOKLYN COLLEGE - CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK), JASMINE HUANG (MIDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL)<br />
A conditioned flavor preference develops when a neutral flavor is paired with a nutrient. We previously demonstrated that this learned preference is highly sensitive to flavor nonreinforcement either prior to (latent inhibition), during (partial reinforcement), or following (extinction) flavor-nutrient pairings. Here we assess the role of the number of flavor-nutrient pairings prior to extinction, and the possibility of spontaneous recovery. Extinction in this paradigm is robust and appears not to spontaneously recover.<br />
<br />
<strong> 2:40pm - 2:55pm<br />
RETROACTIVE INTERFERENCE: COUNTERCONDITIONING AND EXTINCTION WITH AND WITHOUT BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES<br />
</strong>YAROSLAV MOSHCHENKO, ALAINA BERRUTI, JACOB BLATTSTEIN (STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON), J&Eacute;R&Eacute;MIE JOZEFOWIEZ (UNIVERSIT&Eacute; DE LILLE), RALPH MILLER (STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON)<br />
Maladaptive Pavlovian conditioning (CS-Outcome1) is reduced through extinction (CS-alone) or counterconditioning (CS-Outcome2). Towards better understanding the underlying bases of these phenomena, particularly the reversal of evaluative conditioning during counterconditioning, extinction and counterconditioning were compared using a contingency preparation. The two phenomena differed appreciably in sensitivity to renewal as a function of whether the outcome(s) were biologically significant. Centrally, neutral outcomes in counterconditioning allow assessment of pure associative interference devoid of evaluative conditioning.</span>
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
